Faith · sources · inquiry

Sources, claims and review

Understand our evidence labels, inspect the review register and see what independent review remains outstanding.

Know what kind of claim you are reading.

Original source

Preserved wording with edition, passage locator and integrity record.

Published translation

An attributed rendering of meaning; the original and translator’s notes remain distinct.

Scholarly commentary

A named scholar’s explanation, attributed to its source and tradition.

Project hypothesis

A proposed connection or interpretation that remains open to revision.

Published scientific value

A value reported by an identified external source, with its scope.

Reproducible calculation

A result from named inputs and a stated procedure, which others can repeat.

Observation

A recorded observation with method, location or conditions as relevant. An observation plan is labeled separately.

Public review register · updated 10 November 2026

Attribution and review are different.

Source links let you inspect an explanation. They do not mean the cited author has reviewed QuranML. The register below records the review status of the project’s own material.

Current editorial review status
MaterialWork completedQualified external review
Why QuranML: idioms and theological termsDirect citations and wording checked in project editorial/engineering review, 10 November 2026.Pending. No qualified external scholarly reviewer is recorded.
Translation comparison, Qur’an 1:5Edition, wording and checksums recorded. Project observations kept separate.Pending. No scholarly endorsement is claimed.
Timekeeping walkthroughPublished astronomical references and arithmetic are disclosed.Pending independent subject review; no new observational study.
Arabic and Persian interface textProject-authored interface and introductory guides.Independent language review pending.

What a completed review should record

  1. The exact page or source revision and the question reviewed.
  2. The reviewer’s name, relevant expertise, tradition or disciplinary perspective, and permission to publish attribution.
  3. The review date, findings, corrections and any unresolved disagreement.
  4. The limits of that review. Linguistic, religious, source-edition and software reviews answer different questions.

QuranML supports investigation and correction. It does not issue fatwas (religious legal opinions) or classify anyone’s faith. Read the attributed terminology and qualifications.